Submit a Blog
Member - { Blog Details }

hero image

blog address: http://www.editingindia.com/proofreading/

keywords: manuscript proofreading services, academic proofreading, scientific paper proofreading, research paper proofreading, PhD proofreading, Thesis proofreading

member since: Apr 22, 2015 | Viewed: 15

5 polite ways of communicating with a Peer Reviewer

Category: Education

Most Researchers, Authors, and PhD students find it extremely difficult to respond to a peer reviewer. However, panicking wouldn’t help nor you can give up communication with them because of your difficulties and fear. It is advisable to get your research paper once checked from professionals offering manuscript proofreading services. Follow a simple rule when responding to peer reviewer comments, ‘Treat your reviewers in the manner you would like yourself to be treated’. There are certain instances where the intended meaning of your manuscript is different from what the reviewer perceives. In such situations, it is important to maintain your cool and express your viewpoint politely to them. Remember, reviewers act as a second eye in reviewing your research work, and thus contribute majorly to shaping your scholarly article prior to presenting it to the readers. Therefore, they openly bring forth major critical flaws. Thus, one should avoid counter arguments and rude tone when communicating with them. However, this doesn’t imply that you agree and accept all their suggestions. Also, you can get your research paper once read from companies that offer manuscript proofreading services. Mentioned below are 5 polite ways to communicate with a peer reviewer: 1. What you’re willing to say: Failed to understand what we wrote? What you must say: We agree that several statements that we made were more ambiguous than intended. We have revised the text for further clarity. 2. What you’re willing to say: The answer to that question is unknown. What you must say: This is a valid question, and we are curious to know what the results would be. However, we are unaware of any studies that have provided the answer. 3. What you’re willing to say: The experiment would go on forever! What you must say: The experiment suggested is interesting and will provide added information, but it falls beyond the scope of the study. 4. What you’re willing to say: You are being extremely fussy about grammar and formatting! What you must say: We are sorry for this error. The text has been corrected as suggested. 5. What you’re willing to say: My English writing skills are good; then why typo complains? What you must say: The research paper has been edited and reviewed by a coworker who has looked over to correct the errors.



{ More Related Blogs }